1d_fd_simple_shear_transient

commit 5d525ee59d2ddb29c691b5a83da9d57b3d0d7106
parent c8710df9b2cd3c95b746f9878bb673488ca87512
Author: Anders Damsgaard <anders@adamsgaard.dk>
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:10:38 +0200

Reorder content in README

Diffstat:
M
README.md
 | 
14
++++++--------

1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
@@ -2,11 +2,7 @@
 [![pipeline status](https://gitlab.com/admesg/1d_fd_simple_shear/badges/master/pipeline.svg)](https://gitlab.com/admesg/1d_fd_simple_shear/commits/master)
 
 This project contains a simple 1d implementation of the [Henann and Kamrin 
-2013](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219153110) model under simple shear. See 
-below for a comparison with the DEM results from [Damsgaard et al. 
-2013](https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002830). The continuum model is not tuned 
-rigorously against the DEM, and the correspondence could probably be improved 
-further.
+2013](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219153110) model under simple shear.
 
 ## How to run
 The implementation in C requires a C99-compatible compiler (e.g. `gcc` or 
@@ -16,17 +12,19 @@ directory and an output PNG figure is generated.
 Alternatively, an implementation in [Julia](https://julialang.org) resides in 
 **julia/**.
 
----
-
 ## Results
 
 ### Strain distribution
+See below for a comparison with the discrete-element method results from 
+[Damsgaard et al. 2013](https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002830). The continuum 
+model is not tuned rigorously against the DEM, and the correspondence could 
+probably be improved further.
 
 #### Continuum model
 
 ![1d_fd_simple_shear.png](https://gitlab.com/admesg/1d_fd_simple_shear/raw/master/1d_fd_simple_shear.png)
 
-#### DEM results (Damsgaard et al. 2013, fig. 8)
+#### Discrete-element model (Damsgaard et al. 2013, fig. 8)
 
 ![damsgaard2013-fig8.png](https://gitlab.com/admesg/1d_fd_simple_shear/raw/master/damsgaard2013-fig8.png)