commit a05860a75cc642137e6ff9727498f1a35bbe42f8
parent d5645b676e6f30e8de10ee0fb584647833ef1719
Author: Anders Damsgaard <anders@adamsgaard.dk>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 08:54:06 +0200
Adjust figures
Diffstat:
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/continuum-granular-manuscript1.tex b/continuum-granular-manuscript1.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\documentclass[twoside,onecolumn,10pt]{article}
+\documentclass[10pt]{article}
% substitute draft for final
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ We show that past pulses in water pressure can transfer shear away from the ice-
\section{Introduction}%
\label{sec:introduction}
+The local $\mu(I)$ rheology does not work for slow flows as the thickness of shear bands depends on the shear velocity and vanishes in the quasi-static limit \citep{Forterre2008}.
\section{Methods}%
\label{sec:methods}
@@ -156,7 +157,7 @@ These values are constrained from experiments on glass beads \citep{Damsgaard201
For the first experiment with variable water pressure, we apply a water-pressure forcing amplitude of 50 kPa that modulates effective stress at the top around 100 kPa (Fig.~\ref{fig:stick_slip}).
-\begin{table}[htbp]
+\begin{table*}[htbp]
{\scriptsize
\begin{tabular}{lllllll}
\toprule
@@ -186,16 +187,16 @@ For the first experiment with variable water pressure, we apply a water-pressure
e: \citet{Iverson1994},
f: \citet{Leeman2016},
g: \citet{Henann2016},
- h: \citet{Iverson1997},
+ h: \citet{Iverson1997}.
}
-\end{table}
+\end{table*}
\section{Results}%
\label{sec:results}
-\begin{figure}[htbp]
+\begin{figure*}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=15cm]{experiments/fig1.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:rate_dependence}%
@@ -208,17 +209,17 @@ For the first experiment with variable water pressure, we apply a water-pressure
\textbf{c:}
Mohr-Coulomb analysis of till samples in laboratory experiments \citep[after][]{Iverson2010}.
\textbf{d:}
- Mohr-Coulomb analysis of continuum model with varying yield friction ($\mu_\text{s}$) and cohesion ($C$).
+ Mohr-Coulomb analysis of continuum model with example values of yield friction ($\mu_\text{s}$) and cohesion ($C$).
}
\end{center}
-\end{figure}
+\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[htbp]
\begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{experiments/damsgaard2013-fig8.pdf}
+ \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{experiments/damsgaard2013-fig8.pdf}\\
\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{experiments/fig2.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:strain_distribution}%
- Modeled strain distribution under varying effective normal stress with the discrete-element method \citep[DEM][]{Damsgaard2013}, and the continuum model presented here.
+ Modeled strain distribution under varying effective normal stress with the discrete-element method \citep[DEM,][]{Damsgaard2013}, and the continuum model presented here.
}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
@@ -256,7 +257,7 @@ The shear velocities during the first cycle ($t<1$ d) is slightly different from
\end{figure}
-\begin{figure}[htbp]
+\begin{figure*}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=15.0cm]{experiments/fig6.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:stick_slip_depth}%
@@ -265,9 +266,9 @@ The shear velocities during the first cycle ($t<1$ d) is slightly different from
The horizontal magenta line marks skin depth from Eq.~\ref{eq:skin_depth}.
}
\end{center}
-\end{figure}
+\end{figure*}
-\begin{figure}[htbp]
+\begin{figure*}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=15.0cm]{experiments/fig7.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:stick_slip_depth_normalized}%
@@ -276,7 +277,7 @@ The shear velocities during the first cycle ($t<1$ d) is slightly different from
The horizontal magenta line marks skin depth from Eq.~\ref{eq:skin_depth}.
}
\end{center}
-\end{figure}
+\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
diff --git a/experiments/fig1.pdf b/experiments/fig1.pdf
Binary files differ.
diff --git a/experiments/fig2.pdf b/experiments/fig2.pdf
Binary files differ.
